core_shell_ellipsoid

Form factor for an spheroid ellipsoid particle with a core shell structure.

Parameter Description Units Default value
scale Source intensity None 1
background Source background cm-1 0.001
radius_equat_core Equatorial radius of core 20
x_core axial ratio of core, X = r_polar/r_equatorial None 3
thick_shell thickness of shell at equator 30
x_polar_shell ratio of thickness of shell at pole to that at equator None 1
sld_core Core scattering length density 10-6-2 2
sld_shell Shell scattering length density 10-6-2 1
sld_solvent Solvent scattering length density 10-6-2 6.3
theta elipsoid axis to beam angle degree 0
phi rotation about beam degree 0

The returned value is scaled to units of cm-1 sr-1, absolute scale.

Definition

Parameters for this model are the core axial ratio X and a shell thickness, which are more often what we would like to determine and makes the model better behaved, particularly when polydispersity is applied than the four independent radii used in the original parameterization of this model.

../../_images/core_shell_ellipsoid_geometry.png

The geometric parameters of this model are shown in the diagram above, which shows (a) a cut through at the circular equator and (b) a cross section through the poles, of a prolate ellipsoid.

When X_core < 1 the core is oblate; when X_core > 1 it is prolate. X_core = 1 is a spherical core.

For a fixed shell thickness XpolarShell = 1, to scale the shell thickness pro-rata with the radius set or constrain XpolarShell = X_core.

When including an \(S(q)\), the radius in \(S(q)\) is calculated to be that of a sphere with the same 2nd virial coefficient of the outer surface of the ellipsoid. This may have some undesirable effects if the aspect ratio of the ellipsoid is large (ie, if \(X << 1\) or \(X >> 1\) ), when the \(S(q)\) - which assumes spheres - will not in any case be valid. Generating a custom product model will enable separate effective volume fraction and effective radius in the \(S(q)\).

If SAS data are in absolute units, and the SLDs are correct, then scale should be the total volume fraction of the “outer particle”. When \(S(q)\) is introduced this moves to the \(S(q)\) volume fraction, and scale should then be 1.0, or contain some other units conversion factor (for example, if you have SAXS data).

The calculation of intensity follows that for the solid ellipsoid, but with separate terms for the core-shell and shell-solvent boundaries.

\[P(q,\alpha) = \frac{\text{scale}}{V} F^2(q,\alpha) + \text{background}\]

where

\[\begin{align*} F(q,\alpha) = &f(q,radius\_equat\_core,radius\_equat\_core.x\_core,\alpha) \\ &+ f(q,radius\_equat\_core + thick\_shell, radius\_equat\_core.x\_core + thick\_shell.x\_polar\_shell,\alpha) \end{align*}\]

where

\[f(q,R_e,R_p,\alpha) = \frac{3 \Delta \rho V (\sin[qr(R_p,R_e,\alpha)] - \cos[qr(R_p,R_e,\alpha)])} {[qr(R_p,R_e,\alpha)]^3}\]

and

\[r(R_e,R_p,\alpha) = \left[ R_e^2 \sin^2 \alpha + R_p^2 \cos^2 \alpha \right]^{1/2}\]

\(\alpha\) is the angle between the axis of the ellipsoid and \(\vec q\), \(V = (4/3)\pi R_pR_e^2\) is the volume of the ellipsoid , \(R_p\) is the polar radius along the rotational axis of the ellipsoid, \(R_e\) is the equatorial radius perpendicular to the rotational axis of the ellipsoid and \(\Delta \rho\) (contrast) is the scattering length density difference, either \((sld\_core - sld\_shell)\) or \((sld\_shell - sld\_solvent)\).

For randomly oriented particles:

\[F^2(q)=\int_{0}^{\pi/2}{F^2(q,\alpha)\sin(\alpha)d\alpha}\]

For oriented ellipsoids the theta, phi and psi orientation parameters will appear when fitting 2D data, see the elliptical_cylinder model for further information.

../../_images/core_shell_ellipsoid_autogenfig.png

Fig. 39 1D and 2D plots corresponding to the default parameters of the model.

References see for example: Kotlarchyk, M.; Chen, S.-H. J. Chem. Phys., 1983, 79, 2461. Berr, S. J. Phys. Chem., 1987, 91, 4760.

Authorship and Verification

  • Author: NIST IGOR/DANSE Date: pre 2010
  • Last Modified by: Richard Heenan (reparametrised model) Date: 2015
  • Last Reviewed by: Richard Heenan Date: October 6, 2016